This release adds 3 notable features for engineering teams evaluating rollout.
✓ No known CVEs patched in this version
Topics
+3 more
Summary
AI summaryAdded three real comparison transcripts covering health AI, crypto wallet, and support agent scenarios.
Changes in this release
| Type | Severity | Summary | CVE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feature | Low |
Adds three real comparison transcripts to examples directory. Adds three real comparison transcripts to examples directory. Source: llm_adapter@2026-06-03 Confidence: high |
— |
| Feature | Low |
Adds three new example comparison transcripts. Adds three new example comparison transcripts. Source: granite4.1:30b@2026-06-03-audit Confidence: low |
— |
Full changelog
Adds three real comparison transcripts, bringing the example set to four and covering four distinct dimensions.
Added
examples/health-system-comparison.md— personal health AI. The harder case: plain Claude was already competent, and the methodology added strategic depth (beachhead, regulatory risk, an architectural blocker).examples/hyperliquid-wallet-comparison.md— Hyperliquid crypto wallet. The fullest example, running the methodology through Phase 5 isolated critique; the security/regulatory showcase.examples/ai-support-agent-comparison.md— AI support agent that "replaces" support teams. The can-it-say-no test: the methodology pushes back, honors the user's override, and lets sourced research recommend not building — rather than cheerleading.
Together with the v0.1.1 stickman example, the four now ladder from a trivial build to a hard no.
Full changelog: CHANGELOG.md
Weekly OSS security release digest.
The CVE patches and breaking changes that affected production tools this week. One email, every Sunday.
No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Share this release
About Idea-to-build
All releases →Related context
Related tools
Earlier breaking changes
- v0.1.6 Renamed workflow from `idea-to-brainstorm` to `idea-to-build`.
Beta — feedback welcome: [email protected]