Skip to content
Tools / invidious / Security

Security Deep Dive

invidious

Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.

Back to Tool

No CVEs tracked against v2.20260207.0.

— Signed — SLSA — SBOM ✗ Security policy Unknown cadence Active maintainer

Trust Signals — 1 of 9 Present

Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.

1/9 Present
Signed releases Unknown
Latest release artifact signature Latest release
SLSA provenance Unknown
Attestation predicate level Latest release
SBOM published Unknown
GitHub SBOM API Latest release
SECURITY.md Absent
GitHub repository metadata Repository policy
Checked: 18d ago
Release cadence Unknown
12-release median Release history
Latest release: 3mo ago
Maintainer active Present
Recent commit activity Repository
Last commit: 4d ago
Checksums (SHA256SUMS) Not active yet
SHA256SUMS or equivalent Release asset
Latest release: 3mo ago
GitHub Actions attestation Not active yet
actions/attest-build-provenance Workflow file
Latest release: 3mo ago
Signing assets Not active yet
.sig, .crt, cosign.pub, or similar Release asset
Latest release: 3mo ago
7.8/10 Security Score
5.2/10 Scorecard

Security Score

A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.

epss

0.25 / 0.5

No EPSS data

freshness

1.00 / 1.0

3d stale

scorecard

2.08 / 4.0

Score 5.2/10

cve health

2.50 / 2.5

No open CVEs

patch speed

0.50 / 0.5

⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history

kev exposure

1.50 / 1.5

No KEV exposure

supply chain risk

0.00 / 10.0

Risk 0.0/100

Score breakdown

schema v2

Vulnerability posture

vulnerability posture

10.0

25%

direct cves: clear cve scan: available

Release responsiveness

release responsiveness

10.0

5%

patch speed days: no_history

Dependency exposure

dependency exposure

10.0

10%

supply chain risk: 0.0 transitive cves: 0c/0h

Provenance trust

provenance trust

5.2

40%

scorecard score: 5.2 openssf badge: none

Maintainer health

maintainer health

10.0

10%

activity freshness: 3d

Operational risk

operational risk

8.5

10%

kev exposure: clear epss max: none
How is this calculated?

The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.

Scorecard

Scorecard 5.2/10

OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.

Check Score Reason
Maintained 10 23 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Code-Review 5 Found 12/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Token-Permissions 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Binary-Artifacts 10 no binaries found in the repo
CII-Best-Practices 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy 0 security policy file not detected
Fuzzing 0 project is not fuzzed
License 10 license file detected
Signed-Releases -1 no releases found
Branch-Protection -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Pinned-Dependencies 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Packaging 10 packaging workflow detected
SAST 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0

OpenSSF Badge

OpenSSF none

Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.

Beta — feedback welcome: [email protected]