Security Deep Dive
Lychee
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
No CVEs tracked against v7.5.4.
Trust Signals — 4 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
1.00 / 1.0
6d stale
scorecard
3.64 / 4.0
Score 9.1/10
cve health
2.50 / 2.5
No open CVEs
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-0.05 / 10.0
Risk 0.5/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
10.0
25%
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
10.0
10%
Provenance trust
provenance trust
9.1
40%
Maintainer health
maintainer health
10.0
10%
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 0.5/100Scorecard
Scorecard 9.1/10OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Dependency-Update-Tool | 10 | update tool detected |
| Maintained | 10 | 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Code-Review | 10 | all changesets reviewed |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| Token-Permissions | 9 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| CII-Best-Practices | 10 | badge detected: Gold |
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Signed-Releases | 8 | 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts. |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 9 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |
| Fuzzing | 0 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | 10 | license file detected |
| SAST | 10 | SAST tool detected |
| Vulnerabilities | 10 | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
| Packaging | 10 | packaging workflow detected |
| Branch-Protection | 8 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | 10 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| Contributors | 10 | project has 23 contributing companies or organizations |
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
0
Low
0
Unknown
0
No dependency CVEs are currently attached to the latest SBOM scan. Re-run release ingestion if the latest release does not have SBOM coverage yet.