Skip to content
Tools / pyload / Security

Security Deep Dive

pyload

Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.

Back to Tool

No CVEs tracked against v0.4.x.

— Signed — SLSA ✓ SBOM ✓ Security policy Unknown cadence Active maintainer

Trust Signals — 3 of 9 Present

Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.

3/9 Present
Signed releases Unknown
Latest release artifact signature Latest release
SLSA provenance Unknown
Attestation predicate level Latest release
SBOM published Present
GitHub SBOM API Latest release
Last verified: 28d ago
SECURITY.md Present
GitHub repository metadata Repository policy
Checked: 17d ago
Release cadence Unknown
12-release median Release history
Latest release: 5mo ago
Maintainer active Present
Recent commit activity Repository
Last commit: 5d ago
Checksums (SHA256SUMS) Not active yet
SHA256SUMS or equivalent Release asset
Latest release: 5mo ago
GitHub Actions attestation Not active yet
actions/attest-build-provenance Workflow file
Latest release: 5mo ago
Signing assets Not active yet
.sig, .crt, cosign.pub, or similar Release asset
Latest release: 5mo ago
4.3/10 Security Score
5.7/10 Scorecard

Security Score

A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.

epss

0.25 / 0.5

No EPSS data

freshness

1.00 / 1.0

5d stale

scorecard

2.28 / 4.0

Score 5.7/10

cve health

0.25 / 2.5

⚠ No direct scan — 0c/9h transitive CVEs

patch speed

0.50 / 0.5

⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history

kev exposure

1.50 / 1.5

No KEV exposure

supply chain risk

-1.50 / 10.0

Risk 18.0/100

Score breakdown

schema v2

Vulnerability posture

vulnerability posture

1.0

25%

direct cves: clear cve scan: estimated

Release responsiveness

release responsiveness

10.0

5%

patch speed days: no_history

Dependency exposure

dependency exposure

8.2

10%

supply chain risk: 18.0 transitive cves: 0c/9h

Provenance trust

provenance trust

5.7

40%

scorecard score: 5.7 openssf badge: none

Maintainer health

maintainer health

10.0

10%

activity freshness: 5d

Operational risk

operational risk

8.5

10%

kev exposure: clear epss max: none
How is this calculated?

The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.

Supply Chain Risk

Risk 18.0/100
0 Transitive critical CVEs
0 KEV-transitive CVEs
100% Dependency freshness

Scorecard

Scorecard 5.7/10

OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.

Check Score Reason
Code-Review 0 Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Maintained 10 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Security-Policy 10 security policy file detected
Token-Permissions 9 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
CII-Best-Practices 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
SAST 0 no SAST tool detected
Binary-Artifacts 10 no binaries found in the repo
Fuzzing 0 project is not fuzzed
License 9 license file detected
Signed-Releases 0 Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Branch-Protection -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Packaging 10 packaging workflow detected
Pinned-Dependencies 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

OpenSSF Badge

OpenSSF none

Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.

Dependency Vulnerabilities

30 dependencies scanned View full dependency list →

Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.

Critical

0

High

0

Medium

0

Low

0

Unknown

0

No dependency CVEs match this filter.

Showing 0 of 15

Beta — feedback welcome: [email protected]