Skip to content

Security Deep Dive

Smart-AI-Memory/empathy-framework

Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.

Back to Tool

No CVEs tracked against v2.0.0.

— Signed — SLSA — SBOM ✓ Security policy Weekly cadence · 0d median Sporadic maintainer

Trust Signals — 3 of 9 Present

Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.

3/9 Present
Signed releases Unknown
Latest release artifact signature Latest release
SLSA provenance Unknown
Attestation predicate level Latest release
SBOM published Unknown
GitHub SBOM API Latest release
SECURITY.md Present
GitHub repository metadata Repository policy
Checked: 18d ago
Release cadence: weekly Present
0d median over recent releases Release history
Latest release: 4mo ago
Maintainer sporadic Present
Recent commit activity Repository
Last commit: 1mo ago
Checksums (SHA256SUMS) Not active yet
SHA256SUMS or equivalent Release asset
Latest release: 4mo ago
GitHub Actions attestation Not active yet
actions/attest-build-provenance Workflow file
Latest release: 4mo ago
Signing assets Not active yet
.sig, .crt, cosign.pub, or similar Release asset
Latest release: 4mo ago
5.8/10 Security Score
3.5/10 Scorecard

Security Score

A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.

epss

0.25 / 0.5

No EPSS data

freshness

0.94 / 1.0

50d stale

scorecard

1.40 / 4.0

Score 3.5/10

cve health

1.25 / 2.5

⚠ Estimated — no scan yet

patch speed

0.50 / 0.5

⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history

kev exposure

1.50 / 1.5

No KEV exposure

supply chain risk

0.00 / 10.0

Risk 0.0/100

Score breakdown

schema v2

Vulnerability posture

vulnerability posture

5.0

25%

direct cves: clear cve scan: estimated

Release responsiveness

release responsiveness

10.0

5%

patch speed days: no_history

Dependency exposure

dependency exposure

10.0

10%

supply chain risk: 0.0 transitive cves: 0c/0h

Provenance trust

provenance trust

3.5

40%

scorecard score: 3.5 openssf badge: none

Maintainer health

maintainer health

9.4

10%

activity freshness: 50d

Operational risk

operational risk

8.5

10%

kev exposure: clear epss max: none
How is this calculated?

The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.

Scorecard

Scorecard 3.5/10

OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.

Check Score Reason
CI-Tests -1 no pull request found
Token-Permissions -1 No tokens found
Dangerous-Workflow -1 no workflows found
Maintained 0 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Code-Review 0 Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Security-Policy 10 security policy file detected
Packaging -1 packaging workflow not detected
Binary-Artifacts 10 no binaries found in the repo
SAST 0 no SAST tool detected
Pinned-Dependencies -1 no dependencies found
Dependency-Update-Tool 10 update tool detected
CII-Best-Practices 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License 10 license file detected
Vulnerabilities 0 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Fuzzing 0 project is not fuzzed
Branch-Protection 3 branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
Signed-Releases 0 Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Contributors 6 project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

OpenSSF Badge

OpenSSF none

Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.

Beta — feedback welcome: [email protected]