Skip to content
Tools / woodpecker / Security

Security Deep Dive

woodpecker

Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.

Back to Tool

No CVEs tracked against v3.15.0.

— Signed — SLSA — SBOM ✗ Security policy Monthly cadence · 15d median Active maintainer

Trust Signals — 2 of 9 Present

Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.

2/9 Present
Signed releases Unknown
Latest release artifact signature Latest release
SLSA provenance Unknown
Attestation predicate level Latest release
SBOM published Unknown
GitHub SBOM API Latest release
SECURITY.md Absent
GitHub repository metadata Repository policy
Checked: 23d ago
Release cadence: monthly Present
15d median over recent releases Release history
Latest release: 6d ago
Maintainer active Present
Recent commit activity Repository
Last commit: 1d ago
Checksums (SHA256SUMS) Not active yet
SHA256SUMS or equivalent Release asset
Latest release: 6d ago
GitHub Actions attestation Not active yet
actions/attest-build-provenance Workflow file
Latest release: 6d ago
Signing assets Not active yet
.sig, .crt, cosign.pub, or similar Release asset
Latest release: 6d ago
6.6/10 Security Score
5.3/10 Scorecard

Security Score

A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.

epss

0.25 / 0.5

No EPSS data

freshness

1.00 / 1.0

1d stale

scorecard

2.12 / 4.0

Score 5.3/10

cve health

1.25 / 2.5

⚠ Estimated — no scan yet

patch speed

0.50 / 0.5

⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history

kev exposure

1.50 / 1.5

No KEV exposure

supply chain risk

-0.07 / 10.0

Risk 0.7/100

Score breakdown

schema v2

Vulnerability posture

vulnerability posture

5.0

25%

direct cves: clear cve scan: estimated

Release responsiveness

release responsiveness

10.0

5%

patch speed days: no_history

Dependency exposure

dependency exposure

9.9

10%

supply chain risk: 0.67 transitive cves: 0c/0h

Provenance trust

provenance trust

5.3

40%

scorecard score: 5.3 openssf badge: none

Maintainer health

maintainer health

10.0

10%

activity freshness: 1d

Operational risk

operational risk

8.5

10%

kev exposure: clear epss max: none
How is this calculated?

The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.

Supply Chain Risk

Risk 0.7/100
0 Transitive critical CVEs
0 KEV-transitive CVEs
67% Dependency freshness

Scorecard

Scorecard 5.3/10

OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.

Check Score Reason
Maintained 10 30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging -1 packaging workflow not detected
Dangerous-Workflow -1 no workflows found
Code-Review 8 Found 15/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Token-Permissions -1 No tokens found
Binary-Artifacts 10 no binaries found in the repo
CII-Best-Practices 5 badge detected: Passing
Fuzzing 0 project is not fuzzed
License 10 license file detected
Security-Policy 9 security policy file detected
Signed-Releases 0 Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Branch-Protection 5 branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
SAST 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Pinned-Dependencies 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Dependency Vulnerabilities

2324 dependencies scanned View full dependency list →

Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.

Critical

0

High

0

Medium

0

Low

0

Unknown

0

No dependency CVEs are currently attached to the latest SBOM scan. Re-run release ingestion if the latest release does not have SBOM coverage yet.

Beta — feedback welcome: [email protected]