Security Deep Dive
Ajenti
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
1 actively-exploited dependency CVE affects v2.2.15.
KEV-listed CVEs are confirmed exploited in the wild — patch urgently.
Trust Signals — 4 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
1.00 / 1.0
20d stale
scorecard
2.32 / 4.0
Score 5.8/10
cve health
0.00 / 2.5
No open CVEs
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-1.50 / 10.0
Risk 100.0/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
0.0
25%
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
0.0
10%
Provenance trust
provenance trust
5.8
40%
Maintainer health
maintainer health
10.0
10%
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 100.0/100Scorecard
Scorecard 5.8/10OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Maintained | 10 | 25 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | -1 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Code-Review | 0 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Token-Permissions | 0 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| CII-Best-Practices | 0 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| SAST | 10 | SAST tool detected: CodeQL |
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 0 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| Fuzzing | 0 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | 10 | license file detected |
| Signed-Releases | -1 | no releases found |
| Branch-Protection | -1 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
OpenSSF Badge
Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
16
High
63
Medium
50
Low
8
Unknown
3
1 dependency vulnerabilities are in KEV.
CISA confirmed these vulnerabilities are actively exploited. Treat as critical priority.
| CVE | Severity | KEV | Dependency | Affected version | Cleared in release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-3007 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2016-4009 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2017-18342 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | — |
| CVE-2019-20477 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | — |
| CVE-2020-11538 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-14343 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | — |
| CVE-2020-1747 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | — |
| CVE-2020-5310 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-5311 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-5312 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-25289 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-34552 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2022-22817 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-41419 | critical | — | gevent | 1.1b4 | — |
| CVE-2023-50447 | critical | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-40177 | critical | — | ajenti-plugin-core | — | — |
| CVE-2013-4314 | high | — | pyopenssl | — | — |
| CVE-2014-1402 | high | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2014-1932 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2014-3589 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2014-3598 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2014-9601 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2016-0775 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2016-10745 | high | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2016-2533 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2016-3076 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2016-9190 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2016-9243 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2018-1000807 | high | — | pyopenssl | — | — |
| CVE-2018-1000808 | high | — | pyopenssl | — | — |
| CVE-2018-10903 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2018-18074 | high | — | requests | 2 | — |
| CVE-2019-10906 | high | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2019-16865 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2019-18874 | high | — | psutil | 2.2.1 | — |
| CVE-2019-19911 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-10177 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-10378 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-10379 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-10994 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-25659 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2020-35653 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-35654 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2020-36242 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2020-5313 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-23437 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-25287 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-25288 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-25290 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-25291 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-25293 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-27921 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-27922 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-27923 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-28675 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-28676 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-28677 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-3572 | high | — | pip | 20 | — |
| CVE-2022-24303 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2022-30595 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2022-40897 | high | — | setuptools | 41 | — |
| CVE-2022-45198 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2022-45199 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-0286 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2023-38325 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2023-44271 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-4863 | high | KEV | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-50782 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-26130 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-28219 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-6345 | high | — | setuptools | 41 | — |
| CVE-2025-47273 | high | — | setuptools | 41 | — |
| CVE-2025-48379 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-25990 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-26007 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2026-27459 | high | — | pyopenssl | — | — |
| CVE-2026-40192 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-41066 | high | — | lxml | 2.2.4 | — |
| CVE-2026-42311 | high | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2014-0012 | medium | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2014-1829 | medium | — | requests | 2 | — |
| CVE-2014-1830 | medium | — | requests | 2 | — |
| CVE-2014-1933 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2014-3146 | medium | — | lxml | 2.2.4 | — |
| CVE-2014-4616 | medium | — | simplejson | — | — |
| CVE-2015-2296 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2016-0740 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2016-9189 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2018-19787 | medium | — | lxml | 2.2.4 | — |
| CVE-2020-27783 | medium | — | lxml | 2.2.4 | — |
| CVE-2020-28493 | medium | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2020-35655 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-23495 | medium | — | karma | 0.12.31 | — |
| CVE-2021-25292 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-28678 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2021-28957 | medium | — | lxml | 2.2.4 | — |
| CVE-2021-43818 | medium | — | lxml | 2.2.4 | — |
| CVE-2021-46823 | medium | — | python-ldap | — | — |
| CVE-2022-0437 | medium | — | karma | 0.12.31 | — |
| CVE-2022-22815 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2022-22816 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2022-2309 | medium | — | lxml | 2.2.4 | — |
| CVE-2023-23931 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2023-32681 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2023-49083 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2023-5752 | medium | — | pip | 20 | — |
| CVE-2024-0727 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-22195 | medium | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2024-34064 | medium | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2024-35195 | medium | — | requests | 2 | — |
| CVE-2024-47081 | medium | — | requests | 2 | — |
| CVE-2024-56201 | medium | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2024-56326 | medium | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2025-27516 | medium | — | jinja2 | — | — |
| CVE-2025-61911 | medium | — | python-ldap | — | — |
| CVE-2025-61912 | medium | — | python-ldap | — | — |
| CVE-2025-8869 | medium | — | pip | 20 | — |
| CVE-2026-25645 | medium | — | requests | 2 | — |
| CVE-2026-3219 | medium | — | pip | 20 | — |
| CVE-2026-39892 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2026-40178 | medium | — | ajenti-plugin-core | — | — |
| CVE-2026-42308 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-42309 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-42310 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-6357 | medium | — | pip | 20 | — |
| GHSA-39hc-v87j-747x | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-jgpv-4h4c-xhw3 | medium | — | pillow | — | — |
| GHSA-r8wq-qrxc-hmcm | medium | — | python-ldap | — | — |
| CVE-2024-12797 | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2026-1703 | low | — | pip | 20 | — |
| CVE-2026-27448 | low | — | pyopenssl | — | — |
| CVE-2026-34073 | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-4fx9-vc88-q2xc | low | — | pillow | — | — |
| GHSA-5cpq-8wj7-hf2v | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-jm77-qphf-c4w8 | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-v8gr-m533-ghj9 | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| OSV-2022-1074 | unknown | — | pillow | — | — |
| OSV-2022-715 | unknown | — | pillow | — | — |
| PYSEC-2023-175 | unknown | — | pillow | — | — |
Showing 140 of 140