Security Deep Dive
Alerta
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
5 critical dependency CVEs affects v9.1.0.
Audit transitive dependencies; consider upgrading or pinning replacements.
Trust Signals — 2 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
0.96 / 1.0
42d stale
scorecard
2.44 / 4.0
Score 6.1/10
cve health
0.00 / 2.5
Open CVEs detected
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-1.50 / 10.0
Risk 56.4/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
0.0
25%
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
4.4
10%
Provenance trust
provenance trust
6.1
40%
Maintainer health
maintainer health
9.6
10%
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 56.4/100Scorecard
Scorecard 6.1/10OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Code-Review | 2 | Found 5/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2 |
| Maintained | 10 | 20 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Token-Permissions | 0 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| CII-Best-Practices | 0 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Fuzzing | 0 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | 10 | license file detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 0 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| Signed-Releases | -1 | no releases found |
| Branch-Protection | -1 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| Packaging | 10 | packaging workflow detected |
| SAST | 8 | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
OpenSSF Badge
Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
5
High
18
Medium
20
Low
7
Unknown
0
| CVE | Severity | KEV | Dependency | Affected version | Cleared in release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-18342 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | — |
| CVE-2019-20477 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | — |
| CVE-2020-14343 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | — |
| CVE-2020-1747 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | — |
| CVE-2020-26214 | critical | — | alerta-server | — | — |
| CVE-2016-9243 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2018-10903 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2018-18074 | high | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2020-25032 | high | — | flask-cors | 3.0.2 | — |
| CVE-2020-25659 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2020-36242 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2022-29217 | high | — | pyjwt | 2.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2023-0286 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2023-28117 | high | — | sentry-sdk | 0.10.2 | — |
| CVE-2023-30861 | high | — | flask | 2.0.1 | — |
| CVE-2023-38325 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2023-50782 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-26130 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-6221 | high | — | flask-cors | 3.0.2 | — |
| CVE-2025-47273 | high | — | setuptools | 70.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-26007 | high | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2026-32597 | high | — | pyjwt | 2.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-41066 | high | — | lxml | 5.2.1 | — |
| CVE-2014-1829 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2014-1830 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2015-2296 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2023-23931 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2023-32681 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2023-49083 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-0727 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-1681 | medium | — | flask-cors | 3.0.2 | — |
| CVE-2024-35195 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2024-47081 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2024-6839 | medium | — | flask-cors | 3.0.2 | — |
| CVE-2024-6844 | medium | — | flask-cors | 3.0.2 | — |
| CVE-2024-6866 | medium | — | flask-cors | 3.0.2 | — |
| CVE-2025-71176 | medium | — | pytest | 5.4.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-25645 | medium | — | requests | — | — |
| CVE-2026-28684 | medium | — | python-dotenv | — | — |
| CVE-2026-34400 | medium | — | alerta-server | — | — |
| CVE-2026-39892 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-39hc-v87j-747x | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27 | medium | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-12797 | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| CVE-2024-40647 | low | — | sentry-sdk | 0.10.2 | — |
| CVE-2026-27205 | low | — | flask | 2.0.1 | — |
| CVE-2026-34073 | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-5cpq-8wj7-hf2v | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-jm77-qphf-c4w8 | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
| GHSA-v8gr-m533-ghj9 | low | — | cryptography | — | — |
Showing 50 of 50