Skip to content
Tools / cloudflared / Security

Security Deep Dive

cloudflared

Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.

Back to Tool

1 critical dependency CVE affects 2026.5.2.

Audit transitive dependencies; consider upgrading or pinning replacements.

— Signed — SLSA — SBOM ✗ Security policy Weekly cadence · 10d median Active maintainer

Trust Signals — 2 of 9 Present

Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.

2/9 Present
Signed releases Unknown
Latest release artifact signature Latest release
SLSA provenance Unknown
Attestation predicate level Latest release
SBOM published Unknown
GitHub SBOM API Latest release
SECURITY.md Absent
GitHub repository metadata Repository policy
Checked: 21d ago
Release cadence: weekly Present
10d median over recent releases Release history
Latest release: 7d ago
Maintainer active Present
Recent commit activity Repository
Last commit: 2d ago
Checksums (SHA256SUMS) Not active yet
SHA256SUMS or equivalent Release asset
Latest release: 7d ago
GitHub Actions attestation Not active yet
actions/attest-build-provenance Workflow file
Latest release: 7d ago
Signing assets Not active yet
.sig, .crt, cosign.pub, or similar Release asset
Latest release: 7d ago
5.6/10 Security Score
5.2/10 Scorecard
Dependency Exposure 16 transitive dependency CVEs found in the latest SBOM. 1 critical.

Security Score

A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.

epss

0.25 / 0.5

No EPSS data

freshness

1.00 / 1.0

6d stale

scorecard

2.08 / 4.0

Score 5.2/10

cve health

1.25 / 2.5

No open CVEs

patch speed

0.50 / 0.5

⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history

kev exposure

1.50 / 1.5

No KEV exposure

supply chain risk

-1.01 / 10.0

Risk 10.1/100

Score breakdown

schema v2

Vulnerability posture

vulnerability posture

5.0

25%

direct cves: clear cve scan: available

Release responsiveness

release responsiveness

10.0

5%

patch speed days: no_history

Dependency exposure

dependency exposure

9.0

10%

supply chain risk: 10.1 transitive cves: 1c/3h

Provenance trust

provenance trust

5.2

40%

scorecard score: 5.2 openssf badge: none

Maintainer health

maintainer health

10.0

10%

activity freshness: 6d

Operational risk

operational risk

8.5

10%

kev exposure: clear epss max: none
How is this calculated?

The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.

Supply Chain Risk

Risk 10.1/100
1 Transitive critical CVEs
0 KEV-transitive CVEs
95% Dependency freshness

Scorecard

Scorecard 5.2/10

OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.

Check Score Reason
Maintained 10 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging -1 packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Code-Review 0 Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
CII-Best-Practices 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
SAST 0 no SAST tool detected
Binary-Artifacts 10 no binaries found in the repo
Fuzzing 10 project is fuzzed
License 10 license file detected
Branch-Protection -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Security-Policy 10 security policy file detected
Signed-Releases 0 Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Pinned-Dependencies 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

OpenSSF Badge

OpenSSF none

Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.

Dependency Vulnerabilities

101 dependencies scanned View full dependency list →

Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.

Critical

1

High

3

Medium

7

Low

0

Unknown

5

Critical 1 High 3 Medium 7 Unknown 5
CVE Severity KEV Dependency Affected version Cleared in release
CVE-2026-33186 critical google.golang.org/grpc v1.72.2 2026.5.0
CVE-2026-29181 high go.opentelemetry.io/otel v1.40.0 2026.5.0
CVE-2026-34986 high github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4 v4.1.3 2026.5.0
CVE-2026-39883 high go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk v1.40.0 2026.5.0
CVE-2023-32681 medium requests 2.28.2 2026.5.0
CVE-2024-35195 medium requests 2.28.2 2026.5.0
CVE-2024-47081 medium requests 2.28.2 2026.5.0
CVE-2025-47914 medium golang.org/x/crypto v0.38.0 2026.5.0
CVE-2025-58181 medium golang.org/x/crypto v0.38.0 2026.5.0
CVE-2025-71176 medium pytest 7.3.1 2026.5.0
CVE-2026-25645 medium requests 2.28.2 2026.5.0
CVE-2025-47911 unknown golang.org/x/net v0.40.0 2026.5.0
CVE-2025-47913 unknown golang.org/x/crypto v0.38.0 2026.5.0
CVE-2025-58190 unknown golang.org/x/net v0.40.0 2026.5.0
CVE-2025-69725 unknown github.com/go-chi/chi/v5 v5.2.2 2026.5.0
CVE-2026-33814 unknown golang.org/x/net v0.40.0 2026.5.0

Showing 16 of 16

Beta — feedback welcome: [email protected]