Security Deep Dive
cupdate
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
No CVEs tracked against v0.24.5.
Trust Signals — 4 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
1.00 / 1.0
9d stale
scorecard
2.92 / 4.0
Score 7.3/10
cve health
1.25 / 2.5
⚠ Estimated — no scan yet
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-0.08 / 10.0
Risk 0.8/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
5.0
25%
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
9.9
10%
Provenance trust
provenance trust
7.3
40%
Maintainer health
maintainer health
10.0
10%
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 0.8/100Scorecard
Scorecard 7.3/10OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Maintained | 10 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| Dangerous-Workflow | 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | 10 | update tool detected |
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Code-Review | 0 | Found 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Packaging | -1 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Token-Permissions | 10 | GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| CII-Best-Practices | 0 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 10 | all dependencies are pinned |
| License | 10 | license file detected |
| Signed-Releases | -1 | no releases found |
| Fuzzing | 0 | project is not fuzzed |
| Contributors | -1 | internal error: Client.Repositories.ListContributors: error during contributorsHandler.setup: error during ParseFile: line 1: invalid owner format 'AlexGustafsson' at position 3 |
| Vulnerabilities | 0 | 20 existing vulnerabilities detected |
| SAST | 9 | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| Branch-Protection | 8 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | 10 | 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
OpenSSF Badge
Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
1
Low
0
Unknown
0
| CVE | Severity | KEV | Dependency | Affected version | Cleared in release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-42338 | medium | — | ip-address | 9.0.5 | — |
Showing 1 of 1