Security Deep Dive
FreeRADIUS
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
4 critical dependency CVEs affects release_3_0_28.
Audit transitive dependencies; consider upgrading or pinning replacements.
Trust Signals — 3 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
1.00 / 1.0
1d stale
scorecard
1.92 / 4.0
Score 4.8/10
cve health
0.00 / 2.5
⚠ No direct scan — 4c/5h transitive CVEs
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-1.50 / 10.0
Risk 26.0/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
0.0
25%
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
7.4
10%
Provenance trust
provenance trust
4.8
40%
Maintainer health
maintainer health
10.0
10%
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 26.0/100Scorecard
Scorecard 4.8/10OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Maintained | 10 | 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| Code-Review | 0 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| CII-Best-Practices | 0 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Dangerous-Workflow | 0 | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Token-Permissions | 0 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| License | 10 | license file detected |
| SAST | 0 | no SAST tool detected |
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Fuzzing | 10 | project is fuzzed |
| Signed-Releases | 8 | 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts. |
| Branch-Protection | 3 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| Packaging | 10 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 0 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
OpenSSF Badge
Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
4
High
5
Medium
6
Low
0
Unknown
1
| CVE | Severity | KEV | Dependency | Affected version | Cleared in release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-18342 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2019-20477 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2020-14343 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2020-1747 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2013-0294 | high | — | pyrad | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2023-1428 | high | — | grpcio | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2023-32731 | high | — | grpcio | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2023-33953 | high | — | grpcio | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2023-4785 | high | — | grpcio | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2013-0342 | medium | — | pyrad | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2021-46823 | medium | — | python-ldap | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2023-32732 | medium | — | grpcio | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2025-61911 | medium | — | python-ldap | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2025-61912 | medium | — | python-ldap | — | release_3_2_9 |
| GHSA-r8wq-qrxc-hmcm | medium | — | python-ldap | — | release_3_2_9 |
| CVE-2017-8359 | unknown | — | grpcio | — | release_3_2_9 |
Showing 16 of 16