Skip to content
Tools / Plaso / Security

Security Deep Dive

Plaso

Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.

Back to Tool

5 critical dependency CVEs affects 20260512.

Audit transitive dependencies; consider upgrading or pinning replacements.

— Signed — SLSA — SBOM ✗ Security policy Unknown cadence Active maintainer

Trust Signals — 1 of 9 Present

Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.

1/9 Present
Signed releases Unknown
Latest release artifact signature Latest release
SLSA provenance Unknown
Attestation predicate level Latest release
SBOM published Unknown
GitHub SBOM API Latest release
SECURITY.md Absent
GitHub repository metadata Repository policy
Checked: 20d ago
Release cadence Unknown
12-release median Release history
Latest release: 22d ago
Maintainer active Present
Recent commit activity Repository
Last commit: 7d ago
Checksums (SHA256SUMS) Not active yet
SHA256SUMS or equivalent Release asset
Latest release: 22d ago
GitHub Actions attestation Not active yet
actions/attest-build-provenance Workflow file
Latest release: 22d ago
Signing assets Not active yet
.sig, .crt, cosign.pub, or similar Release asset
Latest release: 22d ago
4.0/10 Security Score
5.6/10 Scorecard
Dependency Exposure 21 transitive dependency CVEs found in the latest SBOM. 5 critical.

Security Score

A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.

epss

0.25 / 0.5

No EPSS data

freshness

1.00 / 1.0

7d stale

scorecard

2.24 / 4.0

Score 5.6/10

cve health

0.00 / 2.5

No open CVEs

patch speed

0.50 / 0.5

⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history

kev exposure

1.50 / 1.5

No KEV exposure

supply chain risk

-1.50 / 10.0

Risk 30.0/100

Score breakdown

schema v2

Vulnerability posture

vulnerability posture

0.0

25%

direct cves: clear cve scan: available

Release responsiveness

release responsiveness

10.0

5%

patch speed days: no_history

Dependency exposure

dependency exposure

7.0

10%

supply chain risk: 30.0 transitive cves: 5c/5h

Provenance trust

provenance trust

5.6

40%

scorecard score: 5.6 openssf badge: none

Maintainer health

maintainer health

10.0

10%

activity freshness: 7d

Operational risk

operational risk

8.5

10%

kev exposure: clear epss max: none
How is this calculated?

The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.

Supply Chain Risk

Risk 30.0/100
5 Transitive critical CVEs
0 KEV-transitive CVEs
100% Dependency freshness

Scorecard

Scorecard 5.6/10

OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.

Check Score Reason
Code-Review 2 Found 7/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Dangerous-Workflow 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Maintained 10 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging -1 packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions 10 GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
CII-Best-Practices 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Binary-Artifacts 7 binaries present in source code
Security-Policy 0 security policy file not detected
License 10 license file detected
Fuzzing 0 project is not fuzzed
Branch-Protection -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Signed-Releases 8 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
SAST 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Pinned-Dependencies 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

OpenSSF Badge

OpenSSF none

Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.

Dependency Vulnerabilities

129 dependencies scanned View full dependency list →

Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.

Critical

5

High

5

Medium

10

Low

1

Unknown

0

Critical 5 High 5 Medium 10 Low 1
CVE Severity KEV Dependency Affected version Cleared in release
CVE-2009-5042 critical docutils 20260512
CVE-2017-18342 critical pyyaml 20260512
CVE-2019-20477 critical pyyaml 20260512
CVE-2020-14343 critical pyyaml 20260512
CVE-2020-1747 critical pyyaml 20260512
CVE-2018-18074 high requests 20260512
CVE-2019-18874 high psutil 20260512
CVE-2022-4899 high zstd 20260512
CVE-2023-28859 high redis 20260512
CVE-2023-37920 high certifi 20260512
CVE-2014-1829 medium requests 20260512
CVE-2014-1830 medium requests 20260512
CVE-2015-2296 medium requests 20260512
CVE-2022-23491 medium certifi 20260512
CVE-2023-28858 medium redis 20260512
CVE-2023-32681 medium requests 20260512
CVE-2024-35195 medium requests 20260512
CVE-2024-47081 medium requests 20260512
CVE-2025-69534 medium markdown 20260512
CVE-2026-25645 medium requests 20260512
CVE-2024-39689 low certifi 20260512

Showing 21 of 21

Beta — feedback welcome: [email protected]