Security Deep Dive
pydantic-ai
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
1 critical dependency CVE affects v1.105.0.
Audit transitive dependencies; consider upgrading or pinning replacements.
Trust Signals — 2 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
1.00 / 1.0
1d stale
scorecard
2.00 / 4.0
⚠ Estimated — not yet collected
cve health
1.00 / 2.5
No open CVEs
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-1.50 / 10.0
Risk 27.1/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
4.0
25%
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
7.3
10%
Provenance trust
provenance trust
5.0
40%
Maintainer health
maintainer health
10.0
10%
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 27.1/100OpenSSF Badge
Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
1
High
11
Medium
21
Low
2
Unknown
0
| CVE | Severity | KEV | Dependency | Affected version | Cleared in release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-41242 | critical | — | protobufjs | 7.5.4 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-25048 | high | — | xgrammar | 0.1.29 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-25580 | high | — | pydantic-ai | — | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-25640 | high | — | pydantic-ai | — | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-27893 | high | — | vllm | 0.16.0 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-34444 | high | — | lupa | 2.6 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-40192 | high | — | pillow | 12.1.1 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-41066 | high | — | lxml | 6.0.2 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-41486 | high | — | ray | 2.54.0 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-42311 | high | — | pillow | 12.1.1 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-42561 | high | — | python-multipart | 0.0.22 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-44307 | high | — | mako | 1.3.10 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2025-69872 | medium | — | diskcache | 5.6.3 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2025-71176 | medium | — | pytest | 9.0.2 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-1839 | medium | — | transformers | 4.57.6 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-25960 | medium | — | vllm | 0.16.0 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-28684 | medium | — | python-dotenv | 1.2.1 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-3219 | medium | — | pip | 26.0.1 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-34753 | medium | — | vllm | 0.16.0 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-34755 | medium | — | vllm | 0.16.0 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-34756 | medium | — | vllm | 0.16.0 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-39892 | medium | — | cryptography | 46.0.6 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-40087 | medium | — | langchain-core | 1.2.26 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-40347 | medium | — | python-multipart | 0.0.22 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-41182 | medium | — | langsmith | 0.6.4 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-41205 | medium | — | mako | 1.3.10 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-41425 | medium | — | authlib | 1.6.9 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-41481 | medium | — | langchain-text-splitters | 1.1.0 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-42308 | medium | — | pillow | 12.1.1 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-42309 | medium | — | pillow | 12.1.1 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-42310 | medium | — | pillow | 12.1.1 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-44222 | medium | — | vllm | 0.16.0 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-6357 | medium | — | pip | 26.0.1 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-4539 | low | — | pygments | 2.19.2 | v1.91.0 |
| CVE-2026-7141 | low | — | vllm | 0.16.0 | v1.91.0 |
Showing 35 of 35