Security Deep Dive
Recog
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
5 critical dependency CVEs affects v3.1.26.
Audit transitive dependencies; consider upgrading or pinning replacements.
Trust Signals — 2 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
1.00 / 1.0
1d stale
scorecard
1.76 / 4.0
Score 4.4/10
cve health
0.00 / 2.5
⚠ No direct scan — 5c/3h transitive CVEs
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-1.50 / 10.0
Risk 26.2/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
0.0
25%
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
7.4
10%
Provenance trust
provenance trust
4.4
40%
Maintainer health
maintainer health
10.0
10%
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 26.2/100Scorecard
Scorecard 4.4/10OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Dangerous-Workflow | 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| Code-Review | 10 | all changesets reviewed |
| Maintained | 0 | 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| Packaging | -1 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Token-Permissions | 0 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| CII-Best-Practices | 0 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 0 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| Fuzzing | 0 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | 9 | license file detected |
| Signed-Releases | 0 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Branch-Protection | -1 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| SAST | 0 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
OpenSSF Badge
Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
5
High
3
Medium
4
Low
1
Unknown
0
| CVE | Severity | KEV | Dependency | Affected version | Cleared in release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-18342 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2019-20477 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2020-14001 | critical | — | kramdown | 0 | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2020-14343 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2020-1747 | critical | — | pyyaml | — | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2017-17042 | high | — | yard | 0 | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2019-1020001 | high | — | yard | 0 | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2026-41066 | high | — | lxml | 4.9.1 | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2020-26298 | medium | — | redcarpet | 0 | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2020-8130 | medium | — | rake | 0 | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2024-27285 | medium | — | yard | 0 | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2026-41493 | medium | — | yard | 0 | v3.1.25 |
| CVE-2017-8418 | low | — | rubocop | 0 | v3.1.25 |
Showing 13 of 13