Skip to content
Tools / restic / Security

Security Deep Dive

restic

Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.

Back to Tool

No CVEs tracked against v0.18.1.

✓ Signed ✗ SLSA — SBOM ✗ Security policy Unknown cadence Active maintainer

Trust Signals — 2 of 9 Present

Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.

2/9 Present
Signed releases Present
Latest release artifact signature GPG
Last verified: 2d ago
SLSA provenance Absent
Attestation predicate level Latest release
Last verified: 2d ago
SBOM published Unknown
GitHub SBOM API Latest release
SECURITY.md Absent
GitHub repository metadata Repository policy
Checked: 18d ago
Release cadence Unknown
12-release median Release history
Latest release: 8mo ago
Maintainer active Present
Recent commit activity Repository
Last commit: 3d ago
Checksums (SHA256SUMS) Not active yet
SHA256SUMS or equivalent Release asset
Latest release: 8mo ago
GitHub Actions attestation Not active yet
actions/attest-build-provenance Workflow file
Latest release: 8mo ago
Signing assets Not active yet
.sig, .crt, cosign.pub, or similar Release asset
Latest release: 8mo ago
8.4/10 Security Score
6.7/10 Scorecard

Security Score

A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.

epss

0.25 / 0.5

No EPSS data

freshness

1.00 / 1.0

2d stale

scorecard

2.68 / 4.0

Score 6.7/10

cve health

2.50 / 2.5

No open CVEs

patch speed

0.50 / 0.5

⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history

kev exposure

1.50 / 1.5

No KEV exposure

supply chain risk

0.00 / 10.0

Risk 0.0/100

Score breakdown

schema v2

Vulnerability posture

vulnerability posture

10.0

25%

direct cves: clear cve scan: available

Release responsiveness

release responsiveness

10.0

5%

patch speed days: no_history

Dependency exposure

dependency exposure

10.0

10%

supply chain risk: 0.0 transitive cves: 0c/0h

Provenance trust

provenance trust

6.7

40%

scorecard score: 6.7 openssf badge: none

Maintainer health

maintainer health

10.0

10%

activity freshness: 2d

Operational risk

operational risk

8.5

10%

kev exposure: clear epss max: none
How is this calculated?

The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.

Scorecard

Scorecard 6.7/10

OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.

Check Score Reason
Dangerous-Workflow 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions 9 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Code-Review 1 Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Maintained 10 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Binary-Artifacts 10 no binaries found in the repo
Security-Policy 0 security policy file not detected
Fuzzing 10 project is fuzzed
License 10 license file detected
Branch-Protection -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Signed-Releases 8 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Pinned-Dependencies 2 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
SAST 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Packaging 10 packaging workflow detected

OpenSSF Badge

OpenSSF none

Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.

Beta — feedback welcome: [email protected]