Security Deep Dive
mindsdb
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
30 critical dependency CVEs affects v26.1.0.
Audit transitive dependencies; consider upgrading or pinning replacements.
— Signed
— SLSA
✓ SBOM
✓ Security policy
Weekly cadence · 8d median
Active maintainer
Trust Signals — 4 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
4/9
Present
Signed releases
Unknown
Latest release artifact signature
Latest release
—
SLSA provenance
Unknown
Attestation predicate level
Latest release
—
SBOM published
Present
GitHub SBOM API
Latest release
Last verified: 28d ago
SECURITY.md
Present
GitHub repository metadata
Repository policy
Checked: 23d ago
Release cadence: weekly
Present
8d median over recent releases
Release history
Latest release: 1mo ago
Maintainer active
Present
Recent commit activity
Repository
Last commit: 9d ago
Checksums (SHA256SUMS)
Not active yet
SHA256SUMS or equivalent
Release asset
Latest release: 1mo ago
GitHub Actions attestation
Not active yet
actions/attest-build-provenance
Workflow file
Latest release: 1mo ago
Signing assets
Not active yet
.sig, .crt, cosign.pub, or similar
Release asset
Latest release: 1mo ago
4.3/10
Security Score
6.5/10
Scorecard
Dependency Exposure
187 transitive dependency
CVEs found in the latest SBOM.
30 critical.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
1.00 / 1.0
9d stale
scorecard
2.60 / 4.0
Score 6.5/10
cve health
0.00 / 2.5
⚠ No direct scan — 30c/82h transitive CVEs
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-1.50 / 10.0
Risk 100.0/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
0.0
25%
direct cves: clear
cve scan: estimated
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
patch speed days: no_history
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
0.0
10%
supply chain risk: 100.0
transitive cves: 30c/82h
Provenance trust
provenance trust
6.5
40%
scorecard score: 6.5
openssf badge: none
Maintainer health
maintainer health
10.0
10%
activity freshness: 9d
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
kev exposure: clear
epss max: none
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 100.0/100
30
Transitive critical CVEs
0
KEV-transitive CVEs
58%
Dependency freshness
Scorecard
Scorecard 6.5/10OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Code-Review | 10 | all changesets reviewed |
| Maintained | 10 | 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| Packaging | -1 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Dangerous-Workflow | 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| CII-Best-Practices | 0 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Token-Permissions | 0 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Fuzzing | 0 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | 9 | license file detected |
| Signed-Releases | -1 | no releases found |
| Branch-Protection | -1 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| SAST | 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5 |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 0 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
OpenSSF Badge
OpenSSF none
Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
1099 dependencies scanned
View full dependency list →
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
30
High
82
Medium
56
Low
15
Unknown
4
Critical
30
High
82
Medium
56
Low
15
Unknown
4
| CVE | Severity | KEV | Dependency | Affected version | Cleared in release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2012-0805 | critical | — | sqlalchemy | 2.0.0,< 3.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2019-12855 | critical | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2019-6446 | critical | — | numpy | — | — |
| CVE-2019-7164 | critical | — | sqlalchemy | 2.0.0,< 3.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2019-7548 | critical | — | sqlalchemy | 2.0.0,< 3.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2020-10108 | critical | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2020-10109 | critical | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2022-24801 | critical | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2022-45907 | critical | — | torch | — | — |
| CVE-2023-1177 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-2780 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-3765 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6014 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6015 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6018 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6831 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6974 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6975 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-0520 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-27132 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-27133 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-3573 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-48063 | critical | — | torch | — | — |
| CVE-2025-15036 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-15379 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-32434 | critical | — | torch | — | — |
| CVE-2026-0545 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-2635 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| GHSA-32gv-6cf3-wcmq | critical | — | twisted | — | — |
| GHSA-83fm-w79m-64r5 | critical | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2013-4251 | high | — | scipy | — | — |
| CVE-2014-1858 | high | — | numpy | — | — |
| CVE-2014-1859 | high | — | numpy | — | — |
| CVE-2014-7143 | high | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2017-12852 | high | — | numpy | — | — |
| CVE-2020-7694 | high | — | uvicorn | 0.30.0,< 1.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2020-7695 | high | — | uvicorn | 0.30.0,< 1.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2021-32838 | high | — | flask-restx | 1.3.0,< 2.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2021-41495 | high | — | numpy | — | — |
| CVE-2022-0736 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2022-21712 | high | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2022-21716 | high | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2022-40898 | high | — | wheel | — | — |
| CVE-2023-2356 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-30172 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-4033 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-43472 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6709 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6753 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6909 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6940 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6976 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6977 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-1483 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-1558 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-1560 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-1593 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-1594 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-21272 | high | — | mysql-connector-python | 8.0.20 | — |
| CVE-2024-27134 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-2928 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-31580 | high | — | torch | — | — |
| CVE-2024-31583 | high | — | torch | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37052 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37053 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37054 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37055 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37056 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37057 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37058 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37059 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37060 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-37061 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-3848 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-45296 | high | — | path-to-regexp | 0.1.7 | — |
| CVE-2024-45590 | high | — | body-parser | 1.20.1 | — |
| CVE-2024-52798 | high | — | path-to-regexp | 0.1.7 | — |
| CVE-2024-8859 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-10279 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-11200 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-11201 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-14279 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-14287 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-15031 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-15381 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-58754 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2025-61385 | high | — | pg8000 | 1.15.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-2033 | high | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-23745 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-23950 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-24049 | high | — | wheel | — | — |
| CVE-2026-24842 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-25639 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-26960 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-26996 | high | — | minimatch | 3.1.2 | — |
| CVE-2026-27903 | high | — | minimatch | 3.1.2 | — |
| CVE-2026-27904 | high | — | minimatch | 3.1.2 | — |
| CVE-2026-29786 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-31802 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-33231 | high | — | nltk | 3.9.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-41066 | high | — | lxml | 5.3.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42033 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42035 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42043 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42264 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42304 | high | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2026-42561 | high | — | python-multipart | 0.0.26 | — |
| CVE-2026-44240 | high | — | basic-ftp | 5.3.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-4800 | high | — | lodash | 4.17.21 | — |
| CVE-2026-4867 | high | — | path-to-regexp | 0.1.7 | — |
| CVE-2026-6321 | high | — | fast-uri | 3.1.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-6322 | high | — | fast-uri | 3.1.0 | — |
| CVE-2013-2132 | medium | — | pymongo | — | — |
| CVE-2016-1000111 | medium | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2017-5992 | medium | — | openpyxl | — | — |
| CVE-2019-12387 | medium | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2020-28364 | medium | — | locust | — | — |
| CVE-2020-35678 | medium | — | autobahn | — | — |
| CVE-2021-33430 | medium | — | numpy | — | — |
| CVE-2021-34141 | medium | — | numpy | — | — |
| CVE-2021-41496 | medium | — | numpy | — | — |
| CVE-2022-39348 | medium | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2023-1176 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2023-4316 | medium | — | zod | 3.21.4 | — |
| CVE-2023-46137 | medium | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2023-6568 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-28863 | medium | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2024-29041 | medium | — | express | 4.18.2 | — |
| CVE-2024-3099 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-41671 | medium | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2024-41810 | medium | — | twisted | — | — |
| CVE-2024-4263 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2024-5629 | medium | — | pymongo | — | — |
| CVE-2024-6838 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-0453 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-13465 | medium | — | lodash | 4.17.21 | — |
| CVE-2025-1473 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-15284 | medium | — | qs | 6.11.0 | — |
| CVE-2025-3730 | medium | — | torch | — | — |
| CVE-2025-52967 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-62718 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2025-64718 | medium | — | js-yaml | 4.1.0 | — |
| CVE-2025-71176 | medium | — | pytest | 8.3.5,< 9.0.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-22815 | medium | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-28684 | medium | — | python-dotenv | 1.1.1 | — |
| CVE-2026-2950 | medium | — | lodash | 4.17.21 | — |
| CVE-2026-33230 | medium | — | nltk | 3.9.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-33865 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-33866 | medium | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2026-34515 | medium | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-34516 | medium | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-34525 | medium | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-39373 | medium | — | jwcrypto | 1.5.6 | — |
| CVE-2026-39892 | medium | — | cryptography | 46.0.5 | — |
| CVE-2026-40175 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-41305 | medium | — | postcss | 8.5.6 | — |
| CVE-2026-41907 | medium | — | uuid | 11.1.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42034 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42036 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42037 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42038 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42039 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42041 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42042 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42044 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42338 | medium | — | ip-address | 10.1.0 | — |
| GHSA-8r99-h8j2-rw64 | medium | — | twisted | — | — |
| GHSA-rf74-v2fm-23pw | medium | — | nltk | 3.9.3 | — |
| CVE-2024-43796 | low | — | express | 4.18.2 | — |
| CVE-2024-43799 | low | — | send | 0.18.0 | — |
| CVE-2024-43800 | low | — | serve-static | 1.15.0 | — |
| CVE-2024-47764 | low | — | cookie | 0.4.2 | — |
| CVE-2025-1474 | low | — | mlflow | — | — |
| CVE-2025-2953 | low | — | torch | — | — |
| CVE-2026-2391 | low | — | qs | 6.11.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-34073 | low | — | cryptography | 46.0.5 | — |
| CVE-2026-34513 | low | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-34514 | low | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-34517 | low | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-34518 | low | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-34519 | low | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-34520 | low | — | aiohttp | 3.13.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-42040 | low | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2020-13091 | unknown | — | pandas | — | — |
| CVE-2023-25399 | unknown | — | scipy | — | — |
| CVE-2023-29824 | unknown | — | scipy | — | — |
| CVE-2024-31584 | unknown | — | torch | — | — |
Showing 187 of 187