Security Deep Dive
mindsdb
Security posture and CVE patch evidence from tracked releases.
26 high-severity dependency CVEs affects v26.1.0.
Review the dependency vulnerabilities below.
Trust Signals — 4 of 9 Present
Evidence already collected from releases and repository metadata.
Security Score
A composite score aggregating Scorecard performance, CVE patch history, OpenSSF badge tier, and dependency vulnerability exposure. Score ≥ 7.0 is healthy; < 4.0 warrants attention.
epss
0.25 / 0.5
No EPSS data
freshness
1.00 / 1.0
9d stale
scorecard
2.60 / 4.0
Score 6.5/10
cve health
0.00 / 2.5
⚠ No direct scan — 30c/82h transitive CVEs
patch speed
0.50 / 0.5
⚠ Estimated — no CVE patch history
kev exposure
1.50 / 1.5
No KEV exposure
supply chain risk
-1.50 / 10.0
Risk 100.0/100
Score breakdown
schema v2Vulnerability posture
vulnerability posture
0.0
25%
Release responsiveness
release responsiveness
10.0
5%
Dependency exposure
dependency exposure
0.0
10%
Provenance trust
provenance trust
6.5
40%
Maintainer health
maintainer health
10.0
10%
Operational risk
operational risk
8.5
10%
How is this calculated?
The six dimensions group the legacy score signals into weighted categories: direct vulnerability status, patch responsiveness, dependency exposure, provenance checks, maintainer activity, and exploitability risk. The flat component values above remain available for compatibility.
Supply Chain Risk
Risk 100.0/100Scorecard
Scorecard 6.5/10OpenSSF Scorecard evaluates supply-chain security practices automatically. Score ≥ 6 is passing; ≥ 8 is excellent.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Code-Review | 10 | all changesets reviewed |
| Maintained | 10 | 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| Packaging | -1 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Dangerous-Workflow | 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| CII-Best-Practices | 0 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Token-Permissions | 0 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Fuzzing | 0 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | 9 | license file detected |
| Signed-Releases | -1 | no releases found |
| Branch-Protection | -1 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| SAST | 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5 |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 0 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
OpenSSF Badge
Badge indicates adherence to open-source best practices.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Scanning the SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) of the latest release for known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies.
Critical
0
High
26
Medium
24
Low
6
Unknown
0
| CVE | Severity | KEV | Dependency | Affected version | Cleared in release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-45296 | high | — | path-to-regexp | 0.1.7 | — |
| CVE-2024-45590 | high | — | body-parser | 1.20.1 | — |
| CVE-2024-52798 | high | — | path-to-regexp | 0.1.7 | — |
| CVE-2025-58754 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-23745 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-23950 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-24842 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-25639 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-26960 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-26996 | high | — | minimatch | 3.1.2 | — |
| CVE-2026-27903 | high | — | minimatch | 3.1.2 | — |
| CVE-2026-27904 | high | — | minimatch | 3.1.2 | — |
| CVE-2026-29786 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-31802 | high | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2026-33231 | high | — | nltk | 3.9.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-41066 | high | — | lxml | 5.3.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42033 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42035 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42043 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42264 | high | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42561 | high | — | python-multipart | 0.0.26 | — |
| CVE-2026-44240 | high | — | basic-ftp | 5.3.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-4800 | high | — | lodash | 4.17.21 | — |
| CVE-2026-4867 | high | — | path-to-regexp | 0.1.7 | — |
| CVE-2026-6321 | high | — | fast-uri | 3.1.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-6322 | high | — | fast-uri | 3.1.0 | — |
| CVE-2023-4316 | medium | — | zod | 3.21.4 | — |
| CVE-2024-28863 | medium | — | tar | 6.1.15 | — |
| CVE-2024-29041 | medium | — | express | 4.18.2 | — |
| CVE-2025-13465 | medium | — | lodash | 4.17.21 | — |
| CVE-2025-15284 | medium | — | qs | 6.11.0 | — |
| CVE-2025-62718 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2025-64718 | medium | — | js-yaml | 4.1.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-28684 | medium | — | python-dotenv | 1.1.1 | — |
| CVE-2026-2950 | medium | — | lodash | 4.17.21 | — |
| CVE-2026-33230 | medium | — | nltk | 3.9.3 | — |
| CVE-2026-39373 | medium | — | jwcrypto | 1.5.6 | — |
| CVE-2026-40175 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-41305 | medium | — | postcss | 8.5.6 | — |
| CVE-2026-41907 | medium | — | uuid | 11.1.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42034 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42036 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42037 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42038 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42039 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42041 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42042 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42044 | medium | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42338 | medium | — | ip-address | 10.1.0 | — |
| GHSA-rf74-v2fm-23pw | medium | — | nltk | 3.9.3 | — |
| CVE-2024-43796 | low | — | express | 4.18.2 | — |
| CVE-2024-43799 | low | — | send | 0.18.0 | — |
| CVE-2024-43800 | low | — | serve-static | 1.15.0 | — |
| CVE-2024-47764 | low | — | cookie | 0.4.2 | — |
| CVE-2026-2391 | low | — | qs | 6.11.0 | — |
| CVE-2026-42040 | low | — | axios | 1.10.0 | — |
Showing 56 of 187